On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 08:40:05AM +0200, Bjorn Munch wrote: > On 22/07 02.29, Noah Misch wrote: > > > I ran this program on Solaris 9 U5 (September 2006) on Sparc and got: > > > > I appreciate your testing. A few sources give December 2003 as the month > > for > > Solaris 9 Update 5; would you verify the vintage you used? > > Sorry I was mis-parsing the /etc/release. 9/05 is the month. I should > know that. :-/ This was Solaris 9 U9 from September 2005.
Does it have recent Solaris 9 updates, or is it closer to a base install of the 9/05 packages? Apparently, Oracle issued a final batch of Solaris 9 updates in February 2015. I would find it useful to know the age of the installed package containing /lib/libc.so.1. > From the output it looks like the bug was present here? Yes. > I did a quick search for bugs in libc with strxfrm in the title and > got a few hits but none that seemed to be this one. I was curious about that. Thanks for looking. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
