Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
> On 07/28/2015 07:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
>>> BTW, we're also not checking if the transition or final functions are
>>> volatile. But that was the same before this patch too.
>> Up to now it hasn't mattered.
> Yes, it has. We combine identical aggregates even without this patch.
Ah, right, how'd I forget about that?
> No-one's complained so far, and I can't think of a use case for a
> volatile transition or final function, so maybe it's not worth worrying
> about. Then again, checking for the volatility of those functions would
> be easy too.
Given the lack of complaints, I tend to agree that it's not the province
of this patch to make a change in that policy.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
