=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Tall=F3n?= <jltal...@adv-solutions.net> writes:
> Since PostgreSQL lacks the resource management capabilities of the
> "Big Ones" ( Resource Groups - Red, WorkLoad Manager - Blue ) or the
> Resource Governor in MS SQL Server, we can try and approximate the
> requested behaviour by reducing the CPU priority ("nice") of the backend
> in question. Please note that we would be using scheduler priority to
> try and modulate I/O, though I'm aware of the limitations of this mechanism.
This has been proposed before, and rejected before, and I'm not seeing
anything particularly new here. Without a credible mechanism for
throttling I/O, "nice" alone does not seem very promising.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
