On 2015-08-02 19:06:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'm fine with fixing it, but what's the actual use case for a long lived > shell type?
The use-case imo is that we shouldn't just break if somebody did something stupid or was busy creating a new type while a scheduled backup ran. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
