On 2015-08-04 11:29:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. I got rid of all of the typecasts. You're supposed to treat > pg_atomic_u32 as a magic data type that is only manipulated via the > primitives provided, not just cast back and forth between that and > u32.
Absolutely. Otherwise no fallbacks can work. > 2. I got rid of the memory barriers. System calls are full barriers, > and so are compare-and-exchange operations. Between those two facts, > we should be fine without these. Actually by far not all system calls are full barriers? Regards, Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
