On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, true as things stand now. But this would get broken if we add a > new lock level between ShareRowExclusiveLock and AccessExclusiveLock > that does not respect the current monotone hierarchy between those.
But we're probably not going to do that, so it doesn't matter; and if we do do it, we can worry about it then. I don't think this is worth getting concerned about now. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
