On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:24:37PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > You update the documentation just for psql but your change effects any
> > libpq application if we go forward with this patch we should update the
> > documentation for libpq as well.
> >
> > This approach seems to work with the url style of conninfo
> >
> > For example
> > postgres://some-down-host.info,some-other-host.org:5435/test1
> >
> > seems to work as expected but I don't like that syntax I would rather see
> > postgres://some-down-host.info:5435/test1,postgres://some-other-host.org:5435/test1
> >
> > This would be a more invasive change but I think the syntax is more usable.
>
> I agree with this; it seems to me that it's more powerful to be able to
> specify complete urls for when they may differ.
>
> For the non-url case though, I don't see a clean way of doing this. We
> could always, e.g., locally bind port specification to the closest host
> specification, but that seems nasty, and is still less powerful than
> passing urls (or we could just do the same for all parameters, but
> that's just a mess).
>
> Might it be reasonable to only allow the multi-host syntax in the
> url-style and not otherwise?
First, I agree this is a very useful feature that we want. Many NoSQL
databases are promoting multi-host client libraries as HA, which is kind
of humorous, and also makes sense because many NoSQL solution are
multi-host.
I can see this feature benefitting us for clients to auto-failover
without requiring a pooler or virtual IP reassignment, and also useful
for read-only connections that want to connect to a read-only slave, but
don't care which one. The idea of randomly selecting a host from the
list might be a future feature.
I agree we should allow the specification of multiple hosts, e.g. -h
"host1,host2", but anything more complex should require the URL syntax,
and require full URLs separated by commas, not commas inside a single
URL to specify multiple host names, as shown above. If repeating
information inside each URL is a problem, the user can still use
connections-specific options to controls things, e.g. by using -p 5433,
it is not necessary to specify the port number in the URLs:
$ psql -p 5433 postgres://localhost/test,postgres://localhost/test2
I realize this is libpq-feature-creep, but considering the complexities
of a pooler and virtual IP address reassignment, I think adding this
makes sense. The fact that other DBs are doing it, including I think
VMWare's libpq, supports the idea of adding this simple specification.
Can someone work on a patch to implement this?
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
