On 2015-08-06 10:29:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > It really doesn't. It's just fallout from indirectly including lwlock.h > > which includes an atomic variable. The include path leading to it is > > > > In file included from > > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/storage/lwlock.h:19:0, > > from > > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/storage/lock.h:18, > > from > > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/access/tuptoaster.h:18, > > from > > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c:49: > > /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/port/atomics.h:41:2: error: #error > > "THOU SHALL NOT REQUIRE ATOMICS" > > #error "THOU SHALL NOT REQUIRE ATOMICS" > > Isn't that #include entirely superfluous?
Which one? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
