On 08/13/2015 02:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
So I added the brin isolation test back.  Because it needs the
pageinspect module, it can only work under "make check", not
installcheck.  The problem is that this means buildfarm will not run it,
because it only runs installcheck :-(

I realized that the important modules that run under "make check"
already have custom buildfarm modules, namely pg_upgrade and
test_decoding.  I wonder if it would make more sense to have this be
customizable from the buildfarm server side, without having to resort to
writing a buildfarm module for each new thing.  I envision a file hosted
in the buildfarm server, perhaps a JSON blob, that lists modules that
need "make check" treatment.  Within the JSON object for each such
module there could live the details such as what files need to be
saved.  That way, we could add more things to test without requiring the
buildfarm client to be upgraded each time.

This approach seems to have worked very well to customize the branches
that each animal builds, which is why I suggest that it be used here
too.



The buildfarm server doesn't control anything the clients do except it provides them with a list of branches we are interested in. Even that is invisible to the main program, and only used by the wrapper run_branches.pl. The main program can run entirely offline and I'm going to resist moves to make it otherwise. (Yes it needs access to git, but even that can be finessed.)

If you want some way of specifying this, put it in the source, e.g. invent a directory src/test/buildfarm_support and put it there. That way committers have automatic access to it, which they certainly don't to the buildfarm server. I'd rather just make it a small piece of perl instead of JSON,though.

You're also going to have to handle the msvc side of things. That won't be trivial. See discussion elsewhere today about how we've got that wrong recently.

cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to