On 2015-08-14 11:10:14 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah. The painful issues you're going to face are not that. They are > > memory management (C++ "new" does not talk to palloc or vice versa) > > and error handling ("throw" does not interoperate with PG_TRY()). > > It's worse than that. Any use of longjmp() will cause undefined > behavior in C++. That's because each C++ object's destructor will not > be called (possibly other reasons, too).
Only if that longjmp goes through C++ code with non-POD objects. Which you should pretty much never allow. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
