On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>Say, 6 bigint counters, 6 float8
>>counters, and 3 strings up to 80 characters each. So we have a
>>fixed-size chunk of shared memory per backend, and each backend that
>>wants to expose progress information can fill in those fields however
>>it likes, and we expose the results.
>>This would be sorta like the way pg_statistic works: the same columns
>>can be used for different purposes depending on what estimator will be
>>used to access them.
>
> After thinking more on this suggestion, I came up with following generic
> structure which can be used to store progress of any command per backend in
> shared memory.
>
> Struct PgBackendProgress
> {
> int32 *counter[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
> float8 *counter_float[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
>
> char *progress_message[COMMAND_NUM_SLOTS];
> }
This can't actually work, because we don't have a dynamic allocator
for shared memory. What you need to do is something like this:
struct PgBackendProgress
{
uint64 progress_integer[N_PROGRESS_INTEGER];
float8 progress_float[N_PROGRESS_FLOAT];
char progress_string[PROGRESS_STRING_LENGTH][N_PROGRESS_STRING];
};
You probably want to protect this with the st_changecount protocol, or
just put the fields in PgBackendStatus.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
