On 19 August 2015 at 14:53, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 19 August 2015 at 12:55, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > >> Please don't be rush. :-) > > > Please explain what rush you see? > > Yours. You appear to be in a hurry to apply patches that there's no > consensus on. >
I think that comment is unreasonable. The problem was reported 2 months ago; following independent confirmation of the proposed patch, I suggested committing it, with these words: "If there are no objections, I will apply the patch for 2) to HEAD and backpatch to 9.5." I was clearly waiting for objections before acting, to test whether there was consensus or not. Please explain what procedure you would like committers to follow? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
