Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I'm still doubtful that this is the only overflow risk in that > new ExecChooseHashTableSize code, though.
KaiGai already pointed that out on this thread and I completely agree; but I figured that I might as well fix the clear bug with an obvious fix that was causing an assertion failure during 9.5 testing pending analysis and fixes for the other hazards. Getting past the assertion failure might help identify some other bugs in the area. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
