On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Feng Tian <ft...@vitessedata.com> wrote:
> Agree everything in principal,except one thing -- no, random IO on HDD in
> 2010s (relative to CPU/Memory/SSD), is not any faster than tape in 1970s.
> :-)

Sure. The advantage of replacement selection could be a deciding
factor in unrepresentative cases, as I mentioned, but even then it's
not going to be a dramatic difference as it would have been in the
past.

By the way, please don't top-post.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to