Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 08/23/2015 08:58 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I think that's a good thing to have, now I have concerns about making
>> this data readable for non-superusers. Cloud deployments of Postgres
>> are logically going to block the access of this view.
> I don't think it exposes any information of great security value.
We just had that kerfuffle about whether WAL compression posed a security
risk; doesn't that imply that at least the data relevant to WAL position
has to be unreadable by non-superusers?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
