On 24 August 2015 at 14:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I have to admit I don't much like it either, originally I had this as an > > extra property that was only seen in EXPLAIN VERBOSE. > > Seems like a reasonable design from here.
The attached patch has the format in this way. > (Note that for non-text output, > I'd say the field should come out unconditionally. We only care about abbreviating in text mode.) > > If that's the case then why do we not enable verbose for all of the non-text outputs? It seems strange to start making exceptions on a case-by-case basis. Regards David Rowley -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
unique_joins_2015-08-25_feb3068.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
