On 2015-08-25 14:33:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > (IOW, yeah, certainly third-party code could create a new *instance* of > the ResourceOwner data structure, but they would not have any knowledge of > what's inside unless they had hacked the core code.)
What I was thinking is that somebody created a new resowner, did something, and then called LockReleaseCurrentOwner() (because no locks are needed anymore), or LockReassignCurrentOwner() (say you want to abort a subtransaction, but do *not* want the locks to be released). Anyway, I slightly lean towards having wrappers, you strongly against, so that makes it an easy call. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
