On 25 August 2015 at 21:51, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>
> I don't mean to dismiss the potential for further optimization inside
> XidInMVCCSnapshot (for instance, the one-XID-cache idea sounds promising);
> but I think that's material for further research and a separate patch.
>

Patch attached. Doesn't seem worth a separate thread.


> It's not clear to me if anyone wanted to do further review/testing of
> this patch, or if I should go ahead and push it (after fixing whatever
> comments need to be fixed).
>

Push, please.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment: xidinmvccsnapshot_cache.v1.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to