> On 27/08/15 13:36, Kouhei Kaigai wrote: > [...] > > My measurement is done on v9.5 based system. So, it also seems to me > > replacement of CHAR(n) by VARCHAR(n) will make sense. > > Is there any reason to not simply use text instead of CHAR(n) or VARCHAR(n)? > Text is also welcome, of course. -- NEC Business Creation Division / PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com>
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
