On 27 August 2015 at 19:29, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-08-27 19:19:35 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: >> It also seems to me that this warning has proved its worth > > Same here - I plan to re-submit it. Perhaps the number of bugs it found > convinces Tom, after I address some of his points. > >> although I don't think it's something a production build should be >> producing. Perhaps it could be an Assert? > > It's currently protected by a #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING. A warning > seems to make it easier to actually run the whole regression test, and > it's consistent with what we do in a bunch of other places. >
OK, that seems reasonable. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
