> * It is really the version of libselinux.so that matters here. RHEL > 7.x has libselinux 2.2.x whereas RHEL 6.x has 2.0.x. The latter lacks > functionality required by sepgsql starting with PG 9.2.
Yes, that has been my observation as well. > So given all that, here is what I propose we do: > > 1.) Commit Kouhei's patch against HEAD and 9.5 (Joe) > 2.) Commit my modified patch against 9.4 and 9.3 (Joe) > 3.) Rework patch for 9.2 (Kouhei) > 4.) Finish standing up the RHEL/CentOS 7.x buildfarm member to > test sepgsql on 9.2 and up. The animal (rhinoceros) is running > already, but still needs some custom scripting. (Joe, Andrew) > 5.) Additionally stand up a RHEL/CentOS 6.x buildfarm member to test > sepgsql on 9.1 (no changes) (Joe). > > Sound like a plan? I think this makes sense. Getting buildfarm coverage on any level is better than nothing, IMHO. Kind of a bummer that 9.1 is the only version that will work as-is on EL6 but it is what it is for now, I suppose. -Adam -- Adam Brightwell - adam.brightw...@crunchydatasolutions.com Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
