On 2015-08-29 18:27:59 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2015-08-29 18:25 GMT+02:00 Shulgin, Oleksandr <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> > > Good point. There's still hope to set a flag and process it later on. > > Will have to check if it's possible to stay in the scope of a loaded module > > though.
> I had a workable prototype - and It was implemented very similar as > handling CANCEL Where did you put the handling of that kind of interrupt? Directly into ProcessInterrupts()? Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
