Giles Lean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. the libraries are installed with their base names such as
> 'libpq.sl' being regular files, with versioned names being
> symbolic links to the base names:
> This should be the other way around:
Probably so. I had not realized that HP's linker is affected by which
way the symlinks run, but it appears that it is.
> 2. the versioned names are possibly incorrect: 'libpq.sl.2' should be
> 'libpq.2' by analogy to the libc example above.
This I disagree with: I consider HP's naming convention ugly and
misleading. ".sl" should be in the name *somewhere*.
The open-source libraries I have on my machine seem to mostly put the
version number after .sl, eg
lrwxrwxrwx 1 gnu users 14 Apr 27 2000 libgdbm.sl@ -> libgdbm.sl.2.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 gnu users 14 Apr 27 2000 libgdbm.sl.2@ ->
libgdbm.sl.2.0
-r-xr-xr-x 1 gnu users 45203 Nov 18 1999 libgdbm.sl.2.0*
I'd be in favor of following this convention.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
