On 2015-08-31 17:54:17 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > [scratches head] So does this mean it's worth testing the patch on x86 or > not, in it's current state?
You could try if you're interested. But I don't think it's super meaningful. The patch is just a POC and rather widely incorrect. Don't get me wrong, I think it's rather important that we fix this. But that requires, imo, conceptual/development work right now, not performance testing. > Or should we come up with another test case, exercising the nested > loops? You'd need to do that, yes. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
