On 09/01/2015 09:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Pavan Deolasee
From my point of view, and EnterpriseDB's point of view, anything that doesn't go into the core PostgreSQL distribution isn't really getting us where we need to be. If there's code in XL that would be valuable to merge into core PostgreSQL, then let's do it. If the code cannot be used but there are lessons we can learn that will make what does go into core PostgreSQL better, let's learn them.
I think that is pretty much anybody in the industry's point of view and I agree with it. Although there is definitely an argument to be had about whether it is a module or it is in core proper, no matter what it should be a .Org project.
You are also correct on the replication statement. Replication should have never been outside of core and I say that as the company that wrote a replication solution that even Fortune 50 companies used.
I think that we should consider that there are very smart, very talented engineers already devoting time to their respective communities (XL/XC) that may very much enjoy being part of our community so we don't have to reinvent the wheel, again.
JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
