> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> So apparently, the >> CJK to Unicode mappings are still evolving and should be updated >> occasionally. Next steps would be to commit some or all of these >> differences after additional verification, and then update the scripts >> to use whatever the non-obsolete mapping sources are supposed to be. > > Would that pose a problem for databases which have data in them > already using the old mappings?
I think so. We must be very careful updating the maps. Adding new mapping data would cause less problem, but replacing existing mappings will be definitely a big problem for users. Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
