On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 03:31:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > This is the first time I've seen an indication that the > > start_postmaster change mentioned in the comment is actually important > > for production use, rather than just being cleanup.
I scratched my head awhile without thinking of a credible production use case that would notice the difference. Which one did you have in mind? > Note that this makes the test case in question fail reliably, which is > reasonable behavior IMO so I just changed the test. That's the better behavior, agreed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
