On 2015-09-04 23:44:21 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > I see the need for both current wait information and for cumulative > historical detail. > > I'm willing to wait before reviewing this, but not for more than 1 more CF. > > Andres, please decide whether we should punt to next CF now, based upon > other developments. Thanks
I think we can do some of the work concurrently - the whole lwlock infrastructure piece is rather independent and what currently most of the arguments are about. I agree that the actual interface will need to be coordinated. Ildus, could you please review Amit & Robert's patch? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
