Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > I was running manual tests like a noob :) When you attached you bash script, > > I've switched to it. > > [product_placement]The patch to improve the recovery test suite > submitted in this CF would have eased the need of bash-ing test cases > here, and we could have test cases directly included in your > patch.[/product_placement] The problem of bash test scripts is that they don't run on Windows, which is why we settled on Perl-based TAP tests. I think having tests for various aspects of recovery is useful, because being relatively new it's still being hacked in various ways and it's good to ensure that things that were previously working continue to work. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
