Hello,

At Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:24:00 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote 
in <CA+TgmobxksR2=3wEdY5cEgpd1hQ6Z0WoZEBBoxgs=xkzpbf...@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >> I'm wondering if there's another approach.  If I understand correctly,
> >> there are two reasons why the current situation is untenable.  The
> >> first is that ForeignRecheck always returns true, but we could instead
> >> call an FDW-supplied callback routine there.  The callback could be
> >> optional, so that we just return true if there is none, which is nice
> >> for already-existing FDWs that then don't need to do anything.
> >
> > My question about this is, is the callback really needed?  If there are any
> > FDWs that want to do the work *in their own way*, instead of just doing
> > ExecProcNode for executing a local join execution plan in case of foreign
> > join (or just doing ExecQual for checking remote quals in case of foreign
> > table), I'd agree with introducing the callback, but if not, I don't think
> > that that makes much sense.
> 
> It doesn't seem to me that it hurts much of anything to add the
> callback there, and it does provide some flexibility.  Actually, I'm
> not really sure why we're thinking we need a subplan here at all,
> rather than just having a ForeignRecheck callback that can do whatever
> it needs to do with no particular help from the core infrastructure.
> I think you wrote some code to show how postgres_fdw would use the API
> you are proposing, but I can't find it.  Can you point me in the right
> direction?

I've heard that the reason for the (fs_)subplan is that it should
be initialized using create_plan_recurse, set_plan_refs and
finalyze_plan (or others), which are static functions in the
planner, unavailable in fdw code.

Is this pointless?

regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to