On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Do you expect to do more work on the upper planner path-ification stuff >>>> soon? > >>> Yeah, I do actually have some work in progress. Not sure how soon I'll be >>> ready to show it --- there's a lot of code to break and reassemble :-( > >> Yeah, I remember looking at it a bit and finding it quite an >> intimidating piece of code. I'm just asking because it would be nice >> if we got the infrastructure into this release in time to do something >> with it - specifically, I'd like to find a way for FDWs to push down >> aggregates, a capability for which EDB has had multiple customer >> requests (and I'm sure we're not the only ones). > > Yeah, I'm well aware that this is blocking progress in several areas. > I do intend to make it happen, but it's not the only demand on my time.
Sure, I understand that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers