Jim Nasby wrote: > On 9/13/15 2:43 AM, David Rowley wrote: > >Are you worried about this because I've not focused on optimising float > >timestamps as much as int64 timestamps? Are there many people compiling > >with float timestamps in the real world? > > My $0.02: the default was changed some 5 years ago so FP time is probably > pretty rare now.
The default was FP for 8.3 and was changed before 8.4. Anybody who was running with the default back then and who has pg_upgraded all the way to current releases is still using floating-point date/times. > I don't think it's worth a bunch of extra work to speed them up. Not sure about that. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers