Hi
2015-07-21 11:15 GMT+02:00 Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> This is the patch adds a new function called pg_hba_lookup to get all
> matching entries
> from the pg_hba.conf for the providing input data.The rows are
> displayed from the other
> the hba conf entries are matched.
>
> This is an updated version of previous failure attempt to create a
> catalog view for the
> pg_hba.conf [1]. The view is not able to handle the SQL queries properly
> because
> keywords that are present in database and user columns.
>
>
> currently the following two types are added:
>
> pg_hba_lookup(database, user)
> pg_hba_lookup(database, user, address, hostname)
>
>
After testing your prototype I am thinking so it is not good way. It is
hard to understand what is result of these functions.
-1 from me
Regards
Pavel
>
> How it works:
>
> With the provided input data, it tries to match the entries of
> pg_hba.conf and populate the
> result set with all matching entries.
>
> With the recent Tomlane's commit
> 1e24cf645d24aab3ea39a9d259897fd0cae4e4b6 of "Don't leave pg_hba and
> pg_ident data lying around in running backends" [2], the parsed hba
> conf entries are not available in the backend side. Temporarily I just
> reverted this patch for the
> proof of concept purpose. Once we agree with the approach, I will try
> to find out a solution
> to the same.
>
>
> How is it useful:
>
> With the output of this view, administrator can identify the lines
> that are matching for the given
> criteria easily without going through the file.
>
>
> Record format:
>
> Column name | datatype
> -------------------------------
> line_number | int4
> type | text
> database | jsonb
> user | jsonb
> address | inet
> hostname | text
> method | text
> options | jsonb
>
> Please suggest me for any column additions or data type changes that
> are required.
>
>
> Example output:
>
> postgres=# select pg_hba_lookup('postgres','all');
> pg_hba_lookup
> -------------------------------------------------------
> (84,local,"[""all""]","[""all""]",,,trust,{})
> (86,host,"[""all""]","[""all""]",127.0.0.1,,trust,{})
> (88,host,"[""all""]","[""all""]",::1,,trust,{})
>
> Here I attached a proof of concept patch for the same.
>
> Any suggestions/comments on this proposed approach?
>
> [1]
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f40b0968db0a904da78a924e633be78645f...@sydexchtmp2.au.fjanz.com
>
> [2]
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e1zaquy-00072j...@gemulon.postgresql.org
>
> Regards,
> Hari Babu
> Fujitsu Australia
>
