On 09/15/2015 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > I can't argue with that, I suppose, but I think row_security=force is > a pretty useful convenience. If we must remove it, so be it, but I'd > be a little sad.
There are use cases where row_security=force will be set in production environments, not only in testing. I would be very strongly opposed to removing the ability to force RLS from being applied to owners and superusers, and in fact think we should figure out how to make changing row_security, once it is set, more difficult. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
