Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. It also will be
backpatched.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I see the values being stored on constriant creation, but not being used
> > > > anywhere:
> > >
> > > I believe the values that actually get inspected at runtime are the
> > > tgdeferrable and tginitdeferred fields in pg_trigger. The columns in
> > > pg_constraint are just copies of these.
> > >
> > > It is not real clear to me whether it should be allowed to alter the
> > > deferrability status of a foreign-key constraint --- is that in the spec?
> >
> > The big problem is that while pg_dump's dump_trigger() looks at
> > tginitdeferred and dumps accordingly, pg_get_constraintdef doesn't look
> > at tginitdeferred, and therefore doesn't record the requirement as part
> > of ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT.
>
> pg_get_constraintdef should probably be looking at condeferrable
> and condeferred in the pg_constraint row it's looking at. Maybe something
> like the attached.
Content-Description:
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
