On 18-09-2015 00:59, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Euler Taveira <eu...@timbira.com.br
<mailto:eu...@timbira.com.br>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason to quote "jobs" at this sentence?
>
> 190 fprintf(stderr, _("%s: number of parallel \"jobs\" must be at
least 1\n"),
> progname);
>
> AFAICS "jobs" is neither an identifier nor an option to justify the
quotation. Also, another message a few lines above (correctly) does not
use quotes.
>
jobs is an option, refer vacuumdb docs[1].
Yeah, I know. [Too sleepy to be writing emails...] What I want to say
is: when we want to refer to an option, we usually add "option" after
the quoted name (in this case, it won't make sense). I propose to remove
the quotation because the way the sentence is written it seems we are
referring to the task instead of the option.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
