On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Alvaro Herrera >>>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>>> Jim Nasby wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think things like pageinspect are very different; I really can't see >>>>>> any >>>>>> use for those beyond debugging (and debugging by an expert at that). >>>>> >>>>> I don't think that necessarily means it must continue to be in contrib. >>>>> Quite the contrary, I think it is a tool critical enough that it should >>>>> not be relegated to be a second-class citizen as it is now (let's face >>>>> it, being in contrib *is* second-class citizenship). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Attached patch is latest patch. >>> >>> The previous patch lacks some files for regression test. >>> Attached fixed v12 patch. >> >> The patch could be applied cleanly. "make check" could pass successfully. >> But "make check-world -j 2" failed. >> > > Thank you for looking at this patch. > Could you tell me what test you got failed? > make check-world -j 2 or more is done successfully in my environment.
I tried to do the test again, but initdb failed with the following error. creating template1 database in data/base/1 ... FATAL: invalid input syntax for type oid: "f" This error didn't happen when I tested before. So the commit which was applied recently might interfere with the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers