Hello all,
I'm a non-native speaker and to my shame not very good in english at all. So
just my 2c on the topic:
"Users can make such a change for their individual sessions" is for me
perfectly understandable.
"any user can make such a change for their session" is for me a mixture of a
singular and a plural form and difficult to understand whether this is just a
spelling error (is it individual sessions?) or just another gap in my
knowledge. From my point of view the documentation is not just for english
native speakers but for all the ones which don't have a translation to their
language and as such one shouldn't look at the newest trends in "correctness".
RegardsWolfgang
Geoff Winkless <[email protected]> schrieb am 12:18 Dienstag,
22.September 2015:
On 22 September 2015 at 10:52, Gavin Flower <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 22/09/15 21:33, Geoff Winkless wrote:
Without wanting to get into a grammar war, I'm not so sure I agree that it
"condones" it. Dictionaries reflect the current state of usage, they don't act
as arbiters of correctness. The abuse of "literally" as an emphasiser (which
usage is now listed in the OED) is a prime example.
I would prefer "his or her" over "their". Perhaps our American cousins might
disagree though.
I prefer "their" rather than "his or her", it is less clumsy & there is no
point in specifying gender unless it is relevant!
I agree in that I prefer "their" in informal speech; however in a formal
document I would find it sloppy. I don't think "his or her" is inherently
clumsy; maybe I'm just showing my age.
Besides, some people are neither, or their biological gender is ambiguous - so
a few people fit into neither the male nor the female category (depending on
precise definitions, about 0.5%)!
My understanding is that most intersex (and certainly all trans) people would
identify with one or the other, and even those who don't select exclusively
identify with a mix of both (and would therefore still be covered by "his or
her", no?) although I don't pretend to be an expert.
Perhaps it would be easier to avoid the controversy by actually rewording into
the plural, where possible?
So
"any user can make such a change for his session."
becomes
"Users can make such a change for their individual sessions"
or similar?
Geoff
