On 2015-09-23 01:24:31 +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > I think we put at least three layers on bandaid on this issue since > 9.3.2, and each layer made things more complicated.
2a9b01928f193f529b885ac577051c4fd00bd427 - Cope with possible failure of the oldest MultiXact to exist. 5bbac7ec1b5754043e073a45454e4c257512ce30 - Advance the stop point for multixact offset creation only at checkpoint. 9a28c3752c89ec01fb8b28bb5904c6d547507fda - Have multixact be truncated by checkpoint, not vacuum 215ac4ad6589e0f6a31cc4cd867aedba3cd42924 - Truncate pg_multixact/'s contents during crash recovery At least these are closely related to the fact that truncation isn't WAL logged. There are more that are tangentially related. We (primarily me, writing the timewise first one) should have gone for a new WAL record from the start. We've discussed that in at least three of the threads around the above commits... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
