Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > For 1, Gather makes most sense. > > Yeah, I'm leaning that way myself. Amit argued for "Parallel Gather" > but I think that's overkill. There can't be a non-parallel gather, > and long names are a pain. "Gather" seems a pretty decent choice to me too, even if we only have a single worker (your "1"). I don't think there's much need to distinguish 1 from 2, is there? We can bikeshed the other names when the time comes; the insight in the thread is good to have. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
