hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through... re-attempt
----- Original Message ----- From: "Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: January 02, 2003 6:16 PM > > > static void > > usage(void) > > { > > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG) > > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc) printf("%s %s\n", longOption, desc) > > #else > > #define xo(longOption,shortOption,desc) printf("%s %s\n", shortOption, desc) > > #endif > > > > ... lots of xo() calls ... > > > > #undef xo > > } > > > > This gives us the convenience of a very short name within the usage() > > subroutines, while not polluting the namespace for everyplace else in > > these utilities. > > Revised patch attached as per above. > > -s ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html