On 09/23/2015 03:05 PM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 9/23/15 3:12 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote: >> They also support Postgres as their backend (and you do find hints >> here and >> there >> that it is the recommended open source DBMS for them - but they don't >> explicitly state it like that). We are using Jira at the company I >> work for >> and >> all Jira installations run on Postgres there. > > I'll second Jira as well. It's the only issue tracker I've seen that you > can actually use for multiple different things without it becoming a > mess. IE: it could track Postgres bugs, infrastructure issues, and the > TODO list if we wanted, allow issues to reference each other > intelligently, yet still keep them as 3 separate bodies.
Speaking as someone who uses Jira for commericial work, I'm -1 on them. I simply don't find Jira to be superior to OSS BT systems, and inferior in several ways (like that you can't have more than one person assigned to a bug). And email integration for Jira is nonexistant. When we discussed this 8 years ago, Debian said debbugs wasn't ready for anyone else to use. Has that changed? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
