On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote: > > Hm ... actually, we probably need *both* types of changes if that's > > what we believe the state values mean. > > I too was confused with the state explanations from the code-comments which we have them now. With your explanation here clears that. Thanks for explaining those. After a bit more thinking and experimentation, I propose the attached > patch. > I had a look over the patch and reviewed it. It is in excellent state to check-in. > regards, tom lane > > Thanks -- Jeevan B Chalke Principal Software Engineer, Product Development EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
