On 09/25/2015 10:11 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> I do not know how much emphasis the project should place on point #2.
> By definition, fixing that will not return any direct benefit to us.
I would argue that there is some benefit for us in terms of advocacy.
There are also some negatives in terms of advocacy.
I know we are just being thorough here but I think the idea that there
are negatives in the transparency of our project is simply untrue. The
only argument I can think of is, "Well then people are going to know
everything that is broken." To which I respond, "Good, that is a net
positive".
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
