On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places > that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the > macro that is used elsewhere. Should that be changed for consistency, > as in the attached?
Sure, why not? Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
