On 2015-09-28 17:28:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > What I do find curious is that afaics before 680513ab79 the code also > > looked at errno, not SOCK_ERRNO. And apparently things worked back then? > > No; AFAICS, before that commit, libpq did not use a custom BIO at all. > That commit cloned the backend's custom BIO, but did not correctly > adjust the backend's errno handling for the libpq environment.
Oh, yea. > Will go fix it. We now probably could remove * XXX OpenSSL 1.0.1e considers many more errcodes than just EINTR as reasons * to retry; do we need to adopt their logic for that? since we now actually check for more tahn just EINTR. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
