On 9/29/15 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
On 2015-09-29 13:40:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I think you missed my point: gitlab would then believe it's in charge of,
eg, granting write access to that repo. We could perhaps whack it over
the head till it only does what we want and not ten other things, but
we'd be swimming upstream.
We today already have a github mirror, where exactly the same thing
exists, no?
Sure, there's a mirror out there somewhere. It has nothing to do with
our core development processes.
There are APIs as well, so it could be driven that way. I suspect it's
unnecessary though.
BTW, the docs are at http://doc.gitlab.com/ce/.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
