On 10/01/2015 05:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-10-01 11:07:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >>> On 2015-10-01 16:48:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> That would require people to actually use the bug form to submit the >>>> initial thread as well of course - which most developers don't do >>>> themselves today. But there is in itself nothing that prevents them from >>>> doing that, of course - other than a Small Amount Of Extra Work. >> >>> It'd be cool if there were a newbug@ or similar mail address that >>> automatically also posted to -bugs or so. >> >> I believe that's spelled pgsql-b...@postgresql.org. > > The point is that newbug would automatically assign a bug id, without > going through the form.
if we only want that - we can trivially implement that on the mailserver side by asking the backend database sequence for a bugid and rewriting the subject... But given debbugs is on the radar not sure we need it... Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
