On 10/02/2015 09:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of >> pg_control. It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms >> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many >> overwrite cases. > > BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases > to push this in. I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like > it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date. > > If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...
Wait, we're backpatching this? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
