On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:10:52AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Seltenreich > <andreas.seltenre...@credativ.de> wrote: > > OTOH, a unit test for multixact.c that exercises the code including > > wraparounds sounds like a desirable thing regardless of the fact that it > > could have caught this miscompilation earlier than 6 months into > > production. > > Definitely.
+1. Catching compiler bugs is an important role of "make check". That suite has a notable gap if it passes despite a compiler bug ruining the binary. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
